Monday 26 October 2015

Branded to Kill / 殺しの烙印 (1967)

Branded to Kill has an interesting story behind it, and an almost incomprehensible story within it.
Although the story behind the film should not affect the film itself when presented standalone, it does inform the understanding of it and it may explain some of the approaches taken[1]. More importantly, it is quite fun. This was made in the era of the double feature for Japanese films and cinemas so the studios had a separate slate of directors for the "feature" film and the supporting film - the B-movie. These would be cheaper made, quick to do and not particularly challenging for producers or viewers. There was a studio template (as there was in the US for B-movies) which you would basically stick to. Seijun Suzuki was one of these directors but he tried to play with the conventions as much as he could - push those boundaries. Sometimes, he overstepped the mark and made some terrible films as judged by the company and so was treading on thin ice. Of course, the quality, in this case, was subjective and some of Suzuki's films had been well received. After making a few films that the management were not happy with, his budget was cut and he ended up making Tokyo Drifter[2]. This film enraged the company even further and his next movie, Branded to Kill, was downgraded to black and white. When even this was so bad that the studio president felt compelled to say that 
"Suzuki's films were incomprehensible, that they did not make any money and that Suzuki might as well give up his career as a director as he would not be making films for any other companies." 
and refuse to release the film, you knew it was bad. Suzuki was then also told that he would not be paid and was effectively fired from the studio for this film - the straw that broke the camel's back. Suzuki then sued the company for wrongful dismissal and although this was proven, he struggled within the industry and was effectively blacklisted for about a decade[3] and didn't make another film until 1977.
Set in a 1960's Tokyo, when it was made, Branded to Kill follows an assassin ranked no 3 in the underworld and so in the employ of gangsters as and when required. He is a mercenary, or maybe a ronin, and the requirement seems quite regular to me. Being no.3, he is fairly competent at his job and seems to have the trappings of underworld success with a rather nice flat and the obligatory trophy wife[4]. When a planned hit goes awry for one of the strangest of reasons, No 3 becomes one of the hunted.
The start of the plot[5] is fairly comprehensible and that is all that you need to get a sense of the film but to say it then veers away from that would be an understatement and it inventively plays with the nature of film. The thing about avant-garde things is that if they are genuinely the front of a push, the old avant-garde eventually becomes the mainstream. I don't think that Branded to Kill is mainstream now but some of the more delirious sections are going to be easier to comprehend for more modern audiences. And bearing in mind that it feels kind of different now, I am not sure I can even imagine how out there it was in the 60's. - and the 60's was pretty out there anyway!

I really enjoyed the film, it felt like a ride throughout and it is not taxing on the brain unless you want it to be. It is well, and interestingly, shot and the look is striking - especially for an old B-movie. There are countless nonsensical sections (indeed the crux of the plot - the assassination gone awry is ridiculous in itself) but they hang together to give a nice feel to the film which is internally consistent. This is helped by the length of it as there is not a huge amount of time to run through the whole thing and you never get lost in it. I watched a remastered blu-ray release and it was a clean picture which seemed to do justice to the relatively clean look to the film and I was consistently struck by how exotic Tokyo (I didn't really understand the geography of it all though but I don't really know what Tokyo was like in that era) felt throughout. The characterisation is paper-thin in many ways with quite clear cues to point to a character, such as No 3's strange love of the smell of boiling rice, but again this all works within the context of the film. It reminded me quite a lot of a few videogame plots actually and I can't help but think that it is influential in that capacity, although maybe unwittingly. No More Heroes, a 2007 Wii game, in particular, has the numbered assassins as a central theme.

The real question has to be "Should you watch it?" and I would say, "Yes". If you have reached this point in the review, "yes". But first, watch the trailer:

1. I watched this film without knowing the backstory and so my later comments are made on the film itself, not the package of film and backstory.
2. It seems like an age away, but I used to be a member of lovefilm and they would send DVDs in the post to me as a library system. It was quite good and they had a huge range of films which also included some more esoteric films - like this one. I used it to watch a fair few films that I had barely heard of and one was called Tokyo Drifter which was a very strikingly made film with harsh, stylistic colour schemes and very clean imagery. I thought it was sensational and bought this film, Branded to Kill, in error as I had thought it was Tokyo Drifter. I was a little disappointed when it was shown in black & white but thought it might have been a little like the Wizard of Oz in being both colour and black and white. I was wrong.
3. In many ways, some Japanese industries are very closed and the film industry seems to be quite protectionist with a cartel almost operating to deal with people that don't play the studio game. This seems to have been the case to a lesser or greater degree with Sawajiri Erika and Kubozuka Yousuke stepping out of line and then finding roles a little less frequently than their undoubted abilities would suggest. I wonder if it is mere coincidence that has impressed me so about them?
4. A wife that is a fan of both conspicuous consumption and being naked.
5. I am not a fan of an actual plot synopsis for reviews.

Thursday 15 October 2015

Norway In A Nutshell

I left Stockholm rather early on a 0555 train to Oslo and so headed off to Stockholm Central for a rather long journey. I find trains quite comforting to travel on and so I was not too bothered about the length or time as I knew I could relax on the train. It was also before daybreak so I didn’t miss much scenery in the early part. The scenery was not particularly interesting – but still quite compelling and I also had wi-fi access[1] so I decided to book parts of the rest of my trip. I was travelling in Norway for the scenery and was, effectively, wanting to do the “Norway in a Nutshell” tour which is a journey taking in some remarkable scenery through some fjords between the two biggest cities in Norway – Oslo and Bergen. It is quite possible to do this in one day from Oslo to Bergen as the timetabling is designed around this for each leg and there is also enough spacing to take into account any delays (the legs apparently wait for the previous one in the event of delays). The journey is on a normal train to Myrdal which is the starting point for the Flamsbana line to Flam. From Flam, you then take a boat through the fjord to Gudvangen from where you take a bus to Voss to rejoin the train line to Bergen. Doing this in one day, however, is reliant on there being enough tickets for each leg and, horror of horrors, the trains were booked out between Oslo and Bergen. I had not booked previously as the website for the boat trip had a huge warning about there being an issue with the connection at Gudvangen so had contacted the company who then told me it was an out of date warning. But this had delayed my booking and suddenly, there was not a good way of getting to Bergen. Or was there?
I decided that Oslo was not worth the effort and decided to book a train to Flam that day instead and so a single hour in Oslo later, I was on the train to Bergen. It is kind of nice to be able to be this flexible but I did feel that I missed out a little on Oslo (not that I had heard much positive about it). The train ride was quite pleasant and comfortable (I had booked “komfort” class as this was supposedly more space and hot drinks inclusive, which seemed sensible) with great scenery to Myrdal. I was quite surprised to reach Myrdal at how small the area seemed to be – the station seemed to be a rural outpost and I could see hardly any buildings around the station. I had assumed that it would be a town of some sort on the mainline but there was very little there. I waited at the station until the Flamsbana train arrived and the ride was fantastic. As it was not so busy, I was able to switch between the left and right side windows as I wanted to until we had wound our way down to Flam.
Flam is a very small village which is effectively a port, a train station and a car park with some tourist shops around it - the population was supposedly 250. I was quite surprised at this and headed to my hostel which was basically just outside the car park for the night – as there was nothing else to do!
The next morning, I made my way to the tourist information counter and asked about timetables for my journey. I was in the off-peak season which meant there was just one boat across the fjord at 3pm. And it was 9am. The other thing that was available at the centre was a “tour” to a viewpoint above the fjord at Stegastein which I thought I may as well do in the absence of other things. I also went to the Flam railway museum and walked to the church and back which was partially back the way that the railway came. It was just passing time, but it was enjoyable enough.
At about 2pm, Flam suddenly had loads of coaches arrive and the shops were full of people that had arrived for the boat (and would no doubt be collected at the other side) which actually felt quite weird. It was as if this village was actually a large terminal for the boat (and train) that just happened to be open-air. Some pictures that I saw in the museum and the postcards on sale elsewhere did suggest that this tiny village was used to seeing huge numbers of people and massive cruise liners so I should not have been surprised.
The boat was enjoyable with the fjord being stunning as we passed through and saw the sheer rock faces close up. This is better told by pictures though so have a look there.
The remainder of the journey to Bergen was relatively standard. The hordes did, indeed, mainly get collected at the other end and I boarded a bus[2] to Voss. At Voss, after a short wait and a ticket machine that didn’t accept banknotes, I was onto a train to Bergen to arrive in the dark.

Bergen is the second biggest city in Norway but still not particularly large with a population of approximately 260,000 (which is about the size of Luton – which to be fair does have its own airport). The traditional centre of Bergen is the “Fish Market” and it was also a major trading port for the Hanseatic (Trading) League. I did not know much of Bergen other than this and it also being where Robbie Fowler scored one of my favourite goals against Brann Bergen (which you can see here) so I asked at the hotel about the area and decided to walk through Bryggen and up Mount Fløyen for a view down on to Bergen - again this is better told through the medium of the photograph[3]. There seemed a lot of people enjoying the walk in the park and it seemed a jovial atmosphere although there were also quite a number of serious walkers with appropriate clothing and sticks. The view was really great and I enjoyed the walk enough to not take the funicular back down. For the more adventurous (and appropriately dressed...) there are hikes beyond Mt Fløyen but I was not feeling particularly adventurous and was getting a bit hungry. The fish market seemed an easy place to go in order to feel both less hungry and less adventurous. There are lots of popular food stall which seem to be aimed at tourists but are popular with all and there are not that many tourists anyway.
In order to leave Bergen, you have to get to the airport, and this is usually by airport bus which I planned to take at about 6 to give plenty of time for a 830 flight. I had been told that the airport bus was every twenty minutes but I went to check when exactly they were just before I went to collect my bags. And there, I discovered that there were no buses at all between 5:40 and 7:00 which seemed a remarkable gap to me. As it was 5:30 then, I made a dash[4] for the hotel and collected my bags to return in time (rather red-faced) for the bus.
Bergen Airport is absolutely tiny. I arrived and there were only three more flights that day (which was instant explanation for the huge gap in service) and no self check-in counters for British Airways. I knew this as I walked around looking for them (and walked into the baggage reclaim area, so small is the airport. So I checked in and waited having walked through a large duty free area[5] which was plentifully stocked. The return to Heathrow, as always, reminded me of the differing scale of London to the cities I had visited – some find considerable comfort in that scale. I think I count myself amongst them.

1. This is quite common on the railways, stations and airports throughout my recent journeys. It is usually free which is surprising when they are usually state run and I have been told, repeatedly, that state run infrastructure is unable to provide “innovation”. This contrasts with the “free” wi-fi on British trains which is all but non-existent.
2. Incidentally, I was told that they would accept credit card payment but did not – and I had no cash on me at all. Luckily, the driver told me that he would take cash as there was a cash machine at Voss station but I could have been stranded there…
3. Annoyingly, I arrived at night and took a number of night time shots in the city centre but then deleted them inadvertently later on. I think it was the only time I used my tripod too so it is even more annoying seeing as I went to the trouble of taking it.
4. There was another person, a fairly smartly dressed (but casual) man, doing something similar and he was checking and was happy to get the 7pm bus. As it happened, I noticed him get on my flight too and he was the only person in the whole of business class. He was obviously a more relaxed traveller than me.
5. Norway is not in the EU, though it is part of the Schengen area http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/index_en.htm meaning that there was no border control at all between Stockholm and Oslo on the train. This does mean, however, that the tax-free area in the airport can be very good for passengers.

Tuesday 13 October 2015

Stockholm 2015

From Helsinki, the boat to Stockholm, I had heard, was something of a party boat. With the price of alcohol being significantly padded by tax in both Sweden and Finland, a spot of tax-free shopping[1] can help people lose their inhibitions. There are two major companies that run these routes - Viking and Silja. The overnight from Stockholm to Helsinki leaves in the late afternoon from both cities with an approximately 18 hours in transit. This does not sound too appealing but it can be an enjoyable 18 hours and is incomparable to flights of similar length. The ticket has to include a cabin and so it can be quite cheap if you are sharing (rooms of up to four people) - my ticket was officially a return as I was on a two night mini-cruise as it was cheaper than a single (At €99 rather than €120). Apparently, Viking used to offer the crossing without a cabin and so it really attracted a "party crowd" and so they attract that kind of split even now.
The cruise element is quite well done, I think (although I have never been on a cruise) and we all had to wait before entering to have a photo taken (on sale later...) . Once through the doors, there was live music being played as you walked in to the "promenade". Running pretty much the length of the ferry was a full height (probably five or six storeys) atrium from which you could enter a number of shops and restaurants and there were other bars and a sauna on different floors. It would definitely be quite easy to pass time and, due to the relatively low prices of the alcohol and standard price of the restaurants, it would not be too expensive.
As I left Helsinki, it was bathed in a beautiful, golden light and so I headed to the deck as soon as I had put my bags in the cabin. It was not too cold and there was plenty of space to stand and take photos before we left. I stayed on the deck for a few hours as we left and also to wait for sunset and it got significantly colder over that time. I headed back down at about 7 get myself sorted and charge some stuff before I walked around and had dinner[2]. After eating in one of the many restaurants, I went back to my room quite early and was annoyed to hear a lot of terrible Eurodance style music. It is rare to have good music played loudly[3] and this was not one of those rare occasions. When I came out of the room later, there were a number of beer cans strewn along the corridors.
I got up relatively early to enjoy breakfast and the approach to Stockholm which was a great introduction to the city, especially as the front section of the deck was open for the morning.
Stockholm has two ferry terminals for Helsinki boats and I was, of course, the one that was further away from the city centre. But, even so, it was not so far from the centre and only three or four stops on the metro to the city terminal[4] so I headed there and then to my hotel to drop my bag off[5]. The Viking ferry terminal is near Gamla Stam which is the "old town" for Stockholm and is basically a small island[6] in the centre of the Stockholm conurbation that Stockholm was basically seeded from. This was where I headed for a "free walking tour". There were a few of us and the guide was Ukrainian doing the tour in English. It was nice to walk around and see the area (which I could easily do myself) but the tour itself was a little disappointing and lacking in truly interesting moments. I would say it is the worst tour I have been on and I can barely remember anything from it.
After this tour, I spent some more time in the area myself, checking out the parliament buildings and also the Nobel prize museum, and then went to the south. It was walking without purpose again.
The next day, I went to Skansen and the Vasa museum which are both on an island which appears to be a tourist haven with a number of museums (which in many ways is like the museum island in Berlin). The Vasa museum is about a Viking ship that was rescued from the sea a number of years ago and the museum details the rescue and some more aspects about the trade, generally, at the time. In all honesty, it was an OK museum but it did not grab me particularly and I was a little confused by the very strong reviews I had seen of it. I guess I just didn't find it evocative enough. Unlike Skansen which is an outdoor museum which seems to recreate aspects of Swedish history in a number of historical, or faux-historical buildings. There is also a zoo there although it is mainly Scandinavian animals kept as it is meant to be a museum of Scandinavia (there are a few others though).
After spending a bit longer in Skansen than I expected, I went off to Sodermalm to have a look and take in a few "viewpoints". I felt this was quite nice to walk through and also enjoyed the views as there are some high points and very steep paths, some supplanted by steps. I think Sodermalm is an area that is being regenerated and it seemed to have that feeling of being quite "hip" and post-industrial in some ways. The coast that faces Gamla Stam is quite a transport hub with a major metro station, and a relatively complicated road junction which must take away some of the potential grandeur of the place. There are also a number of boats moored up near here with accommodation for tourists and these are apparently some of the most fun (and cheap) hostels in the city. I can imagine that and they looked welcoming enough and maybe that is where I would return to.
From Stockholm, I was due to leave quite early in the morning to go to Oslo on the train and I returned relatively early.
Stockholm 2015 – click for photo album

1. This is achieved with a stop at Mariehamn which is outside the EU VAT area and so this tax free shopping is allowed. I would imagine that this is a major boon for these ferry crossings.
2. Although early, some passengers had clearly spent some time in their rooms getting themselves ready for making a night of it and I rather awkwardly shared a lift with a bevy of glammed up beauties (they looked very young and excited) while wearing a big coat. They then awkwardly walked around as the only people dressed up.
3. When I moved to Kentish Town a few years ago, one of the first Friday nights, I went to sleep quite late at about 1am and I could hear some music - not too loud in my flat and only really noticeable when going to sleep. I was initially a little annoyed but after a second or so, I realised that it was Abbey Road by The Beatles and my annoyance faded away very quickly. I rather enjoyed it.
4. When I got there, I realised that I had left something quite important on the ferry and so rushed back to the ferry - I was very lucky here to have booked a round trip...
5. I was actually able to check in as a room was ready so this was a good service by Hotel Micro. Stockholm is fairly expensive so the Hotel Micro concept was very good. It is not quite capsule hotel style, but the rooms are small with space for little more than the bed and a small table. These kinds of places are ideal for someone like me and Micro is actually in the basement of another hotel so the services are the same as for that hotel.
6. Stockholm is made up of 14 islands.

Sunday 11 October 2015

Helsinki 2015

As I got off the flight, the first thing I thought of was "aren't these stairs rather shallow?". And they were. It is not something you notice usually, but it was the first thing.
I was late into Helsinki and that meant I was definitely going to be late to meet my cousin. And late I was, but he knew this already as I had told him. It seems barely plausible that this would have caused major problems in the past but we were connected (via the internet in the air) while I was on my way so it was not a huge problem. I got the train into Helsinki Central but not before getting the bus. Helsinki airport prides itself (link) on the compact scale of it, saying that it is a very easy airport to navigate but I found the exit quite unclear. There was not a sign to the trains and I needed to actually get a bus to the train station. There were also buses but it seemed to make sense to go by train. I wanted to get a day pass as I knew I would be travelling around and the airport transport was included in the zone. Once I got to the train station, rather farcically, you could only buy single tickets as there was no ticket machine or even ticket office - just what appeared to be a stall selling tickets. I asked about passes and the lady said that it was not possible until I reached Helsinki. The station was still in the process of being built, but I think they should have got this right! After this, I walked through the station being hewn from rock all the way down - it was quite impressive. The station had two platforms and both went to the same place but in opposite directions. I was confused by this and the signage was generally quite poor but the airport station sits, effectively, at one end of a loop with Helsinki Central at the other. Once I had worked this out, a young lady came and asked me how to buy a ticket... I told her that I got mine from upstairs (it was quite a long walk) but someone kindly interjected that it was possible to buy on the train. It is interesting, when travelling, how variable the quality of signs and directions are but it took me far longer to work out what to do than it should have. Helsinki Central is a beautiful station so it is a great introduction to the city proper.

I found my cousin (hereafter, C) waiting outside as planned - this part had worked like clockwork. We hadn't seen each other for almost ten years so I was just glad that I could recognise him[1]. We exchanged pleasantries and then we set off in search of something to eat (quickly) and to try and extract something of Helsinki from the day within the few hours of daylight remaining by wandering.
C lived in Espoo which is theoretically a town outside Helsinki[2] and so we needed to get out of Helsinki by bus from Kampi (an area near the centre with a large bus station).
I got up much later than I wanted to but a plan is a plan and we had planned to go to the nearby Nuuksio national park. It seemed close enough but the journey was quite long as we needed to get two buses and neither was frequent so we waited for a long time at each[3]. The bus there eventually full and then emptied a stop or two before the end and so, in the spirit of adventure, we also got off and walked. It was a place to walk, so why not?
A good few hours later, including some time getting lost, time had pleasantly passed by. I was often told to "get lost" as a child and this is advice I have always taken to heart and so it was quite an enjoyable walk around the park along some well signposted[4] trails.

We returned to Helsinki later for the evening for no particular reason.
I was leaving Helsinki on the third day and, as chance would have it, C was leaving Espoo on that day too (to move to Vantaa) and so we said our goodbyes in the morning as I headed to Helsinki for a day of wandering[5] after dropping my bag off at the station[6]. My boat out of town was at 5pm and I was told that to get to the terminal for 4pm would be sensible so I planned a few hours of walking around based on that. 

I started out near Market Square which is where many people seem to consider the centre of the city is. Here, there are a number of fishy items for sale and some food and drink. It is also quite near Helsinki Cathedral which is white and so even the redevelopment of one side of it using white cloth to cover it is quite well hidden. The took me towards the docks and here I wandered in quite a quiet area in the sun to look back on Helsinki. This reminded me a little of a much ranier day in Zurich actually. I also went to the Olympic stadium area and a Rock cathedral which were both distraction enough for me and involved taking the tram for part of the way. There was not a huge desirre to traipse around so I made my way to the boat after a little detour to collect my bag and have some food and then walked down to the terminal from Market Square.
I boarded the boat and thought, "these stairs are rather shallow" again.
And so on to Stockholm ->


Helsinki 2015 - click for photo album


1. I speak, fluently, one language but I can speak Bengali a fair amount. Last time I saw C, I was in Bangladesh and my relationship with him has always been in Bengali but I was not really sure what to do here. I am quite awkward with these kinds of things and I have a terrible memory for how my relationships are manifested which is most obvious with female friends. I find it really hard to remember if I have a nodding, hugging, kissing or just inane smiling welcome with them. It is easier with male friends as it is usually nothing at all as I have a rational dislike of handshakes with friends. How do people remember? If you could drop me a line in the comments or directly to help me with a system, that would be great.
2. Finland is so centralised in terms of population that the 3 biggest cities (Helsinki (~625k), Espoo (~265k) and Vantaa(~210k)) in the country are all basically next to each other within the “capital region”. I would not go as far as saying it is exactly a megalopolis as the greater Tokyo-Yokohama conurbation is, but it is all connected in the sense that it seems that they serve each other. Finland’s population is about 5.5m and with some other smaller towns in the capital region taking the population to about 1.5m – the capital region has over a quarter of the whole population.
3. I don't usually wait for buses for very long when I am abroad but I caught myself waiting as I do in London. What this meant was that I was looking the wrong way - in the opposite direction to the traffic and at all the people (the stop sign was still at that end). It was quite odd but I could not break the habit throughout the trip. Public transport muscle memory - if only there was a compound noun for that. There probably is in German.
4. I am, however, colourblind and mixing red and brown up does not always aid navigation.
5. I had changed my plans for the Monday as I felt that I should spend some more time in Helsinki after the slight delay on Saturday. I was going to go to Turku, which was the old capital and also had a ferry to Stockholm, but I had seen little of the sights in Helsinki.
6. The Finnish Railways company is called VR and the logo is remarkably similar to the JR of Japanese Railways. On this, the most flimsy of reasons, I assumed that lockers would be plentiful at the station as they are at most major JR stations. I was right.

Saturday 29 August 2015

Ikiru / 生きる (1952)

Death is inevitable. We all know this at some level once we become aware of mortality but it is an unknown. A known unknown[1], but what if it were known? Would we act differently? Of course we would[2] but how would we change?
Ikiru is the story of a man, Kanji Watanabe, masterfully played by Takashi Shimura, who has worked hard in a standard job in local government, doing all the things that he should have done and become a respectable, upstanding citizen. But what, he asks, has that actually achieved - or what will it achieve? His job isn't to achieve things, it is to keep going (I assume most people have some experience of jobs that seem not to do anything worthwhile) and that is the purpose of so many jobs. When diagnosed with cancer, he realises that he has not been "living" for some time already. And so what does he do? What would you do?
The classic response is to drink and lose yourself in merriment which Kanji does in a local night time district. But, after some time, this joy is as empty a joy as the boredom of his work was. One thing he doesn't do, pointedly, is tell anyone, such as colleagues and family about his medical situation - including his own son. Watanabe lives with his son and daughter-in-law and they also have quite a frosty relationship with him. He seems to have no major friends at work either to confide in - he was already the owner of the rather unhappy nickname of "The Corpse" anyway. So he decides that, until he dies, he will live with a purpose -  a purpose to keep him living. A purpose to start living. Eventually within the film, Watanabe finds something to focus on - the creation of a children's playground, something to keep himself going and then he dies[3] .
The "then he dies" is shown by the fact that you are then at Watanabe's wake and the rest of the film, which feels like about half of the film, is told from the perspective of other people which I think is an interesting way of approaching this. Those people all seem to have different views on those last few months and they have conflicting views on him from it.
I think Ikiru may be my favourite Akira Kurosawa film, which, with his CV, is pretty high praise. The nature of the film is relatively simple but the way of telling it enlivens the film considerably. Rashomon, which is a little more famous, has a nice way of dealing with how perspectives change the "facts" of an incident and here there is a similar aspect. Watanabe's death was a surprise to all of those at his wake and so people did not suddenly treat him differently as he became ill. His strange divergence from character was not necessarily seen as a forewarning for his death (and this may now be quite standard as a "mid-life crisis" but I am not sure that this phenomenon really existed in the 50's). I find it intriguing that he would not tell his son for, basically, an instant boost to his relationship with him. This may be, from his own perspective, be the punishment that he deserved for his dereliction over years as a father. There is something quite honourable about facing your punishment "like a man" and dealing with the consequences and not taking the easy route out and I guess this stoicism was seen as a large positive for a character. I am also kind of interested about the idea of someone doing good works[4] that are not recognised at the time and only receive recognition posthumously. But we don't all need to have cancer to do good things, maybe we all need to find our own playground to build.
I would really recommend the film to everyone. Of course, for many, there are the issues of both being black and white and foreign language which may be two stumbling blocks too many for a lot of people. If you can get over those, this is a great film and if you can watch it, you really should.


1. Rumsfeld's Knowns and Unknowns: The Intellectual History of a Quip.
2. I listened to an interesting LSE lecture entitiled "After your death" recently about how we would react if we knew when we died, that everyone else in the world would too. It is here.
3. This is so Japanese in storytelling style! It is as sudden as in the text though.
4. This is rather like the opposite of the end of The Boss in Metal Gear Solid 3, one of my favourite videogames that I have been playing recently, someone who was truly destroyed after death.

Thursday 23 July 2015

Perfect Blue (1997)

"Walt Disney meets Alfred Hitchcock"[1]
Animated films always used to get compared to "Walt Disney" when I was younger. The content was entirely irrelevant but I guess it all depends on your cultural influences - and in the past, it was only Disney that could get animated films on to the big screen. That has changed a little with computer graphics allowing more companies to break out in the west but cel-animated films are very rare.
The 90s is probably when CG really came into its own and that, in many ways, diminished the ability of animated films to depict things that would be either ridiculous or prohibitively expensive to do in live action. The two seminal films, probably the best-known anime films of the time, Akira (1988) and Ghost In the Shell (1995), would be difficult to visualise in live action without a lot of money. The Matrix took a lot of ideas (and wholesale ripped off some shots too) from Ghost in the Shell but that was a very large budget film. Perfect Blue, however, could easily be replicated in live action form and so, it has to be said, there seems little point in animating it. But then that is approaching it from the wrong angle, I think. Animated films are not, really, a genre but they have almost cul-de-saced into one with the number of Western animated films that are anything but light and fluffy pieces aimed at children fairly low. Similarly, there are seemingly few Japanese animated films that are not filled with technology and/or copious amounts of violence. In actuality, there are different animated films made, but they are often not distributed widely outside of Japan (or even inside Japan)[2] - which is something of a self-fulfilling notion of the market they can have.

At 80 minutes, Perfect Blue is barely even feature length in my opinion[3] as I feel it is a film when it is 90 minutes, although this is a personal feeling. But those 80 minutes are quite densely packed with narrative and weight with the portrayal of a young pop idol's transition to the more grown-up world of acting. Idols, in this sense, were a quite domestic phenomenon but I think they are easier to comprehend now with the multimedia nature of stardom, so the opening scene of an outdoor show of the pop act "Cham!" is easy enough to get. Cham! appear to be a middling pop group that is coming to a natural end as one of their trio is to announce her departure - although pop acts can always continue with replacements of course. As a group of two or three years standing, they have a number of fans at the show and they are introduced as partly fanatical and partly understanding of the trajectory. The departure is so that one member of the act, Mima, can pursue a career as an actress - starting with a simple role in a TV drama[4] which she hopes will lead to larger things. Actually, what she wishes seems irrelevant and we are shown her management team positioning her into roles and career moves - and Mima is happy to do what others want from her to keep everyone happy. I guess it is her way of repaying their efforts and faith in her.
At the same time as leaving Cham!, Mima also comes across the phrase "Mima's Room" which her manager tells her must refer to a website, or fansite, about her. As this is set in the 90s, this concept is not something that Mima is aware of so she gets a computer which her manager helps her set up (with a nice bit of Apple product placement) and checks in on Mima's Room - a site that seems to be a diary by Mima herself - which is kind of fun.
It appears that not all of Mima's fans have taken well to her departure and she starts receiving threatening and abusive faxes[5] as she progresses in the world of acting. The progress does entail some more "adult" scenes to which her fan reacts quite badly - as does Mima herself and it is at this point that the film takes a turn into psychological thriller territory. When Mima realises that "Mima's Room" is remarkably faithful to the reality of her day, she is quite disturbed as to what it means. Is she writing this herself? Is she being stalked? Animation is a good medium for this mind-bending stuff as you can play around with scenery and ideas quite easily in terms of the way it is portrayed and this is done quite expertly (especially for a debut feature) in the second part of the film. As the strands of the reprisals and stalking come to a head, it is a truly impressive spiral down through a breakdown as Mima falls apart.
I really enjoyed Perfect Blue as it is actually quite a "straight" film in that it is clear what is happening at the beginning and end. The whole film is quite ambiguous as to what is real and what is not (though I understand that the dubbed version is less ambiguous) as well as the conclusions but it allows the viewer to engage as they want. These kinds of layered films are often difficult to follow but Perfect Blue does not really care if you follow or not - there are a few points when it is a bit over the top as Mima is unsure if what is happening is real on top of the viewer being unsure if Mima is acting or not as much of the TV programme she is acting on is a psychological thriller itself. As the film is not particularly long, the lengths of time that the confusion reigns is actually fairly short and the explanations are soon to hand. The length also makes the film tight and well-paced - the bulk of film itself takes place over a few days with a relatively simple story arc. Watching again, a few years later is very interesting as I think Perfect Blue's influence can be seen in a few more mainstream films. Darren Aronofsky was clearly a major fan and the similarities with Black Swan and some of the shots in Requiem for a Dream and The Wrestler unmistakably inspired by this film[6]. On that note, the visuals are nicely understated with good use of static shots and little in the way of unnecessary movement. The one chase scene in the film is brilliantly done with its mix of reality and imagination beautifully captured and the tension from it coming out very well. The unreal nature of what is really happening adds to the scene massively.
The story and message, for what it is worth, is quite rooted in the time but it is quite relevant today with the elevated entitlement and (cyber)stalking of fans/trolls being a recurring theme of modern celebrity culture. That balancing act and tension of being close to the fans but also the risks of that closeness are much more obvious to all now, but the film explores it quite well. I think that nature of the relationship being analogous to the growth in social media (probably most obviously twitter) is quite far-sighted for a 90s film and the duality of the character is similar to how a lot of people can be online - with a far more aggressive and extreme version online. There has been a bit of a general reappraisal of Perfect Blue, especially from when the director, Satoshi Kon, passed away and it is held in quite high regard now. At the time of release, it had a mixed reception but I would hope that some of the people that did not react positively would take the time to watch it again. It isn't very long, anyway...

Trailer here:


1. Apparently, this was in a review by Roger Corman  and was the main thing I remember from the cover of the video.
2. In 2004, I very excitedly went to see an animated film, Appleseed, at the cinema in Roppongi Hills. I distinctly remember at the time being quite excited at being able to watch anime on a big screen and being conscious of the fact that I may never get the opportunity again. I am not sure what happened over the years that enabled anime to be released, in a limited way, in cinemas in the UK, but something changed. I have since been able to see quite a few animated releases at London cinemas - to the point where I don't feel I have to go to see them there.
3. According to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, American Film Institute, and British Film Institute, a feature film runs for 40 minutes or longer, while the Screen Actors Guild states that it is 80 minutes or longer. My sense of 90 minutes is based on nothing other than my feeling, so it is not correct.
4. It is this simple role that suggests to me that Cham! were not that big - I have seen a few reviews that suggest that Cham! were quite big, but I do not think this is a story about a "star", rather it is about the chasing of stardom.
5. This does date the film a little, but it is interesting in this way - the pre-internet.
6. I thought of this film quite a lot when watching Helter Skelter (reviewed here) which has a similar story arc although the details are not necessarily the same. Again, the thrust is similar but there are some fundamental differences but the similarities with Black Swan are arguably more pronounced. As I consider both Black Swan and Helter Skelter as two of my favourite films of the decade (so far), it does suggest that I'd like Perfect Blue.


Monday 29 June 2015

Footnotes: a study in not having a clear, linear path through conversation

Sometimes, I think I sort of live my life in footnotes.
I use footnotes quite a bit in my writing as I think they work quite well in explaining, and illustrating, my thought processes. My blog posts aim, in the main, to be my voice - to sound like me. I think that I do manage this a lot of the time but, in order to achieve that, I do have to weave together all the competing and complementary thoughts in my head into single statements. Of course, we all do this when talking and anyone that has spoken much with me will know that I make a lot of throwaway comments that seem disconnected from the thrust of a conversation but make perfect sense in my head. Thus, I sometimes laugh and smile at inopportune moments. Politeness means that often people will laugh or join in but I have noticed that a lot of people I speak to also do not know what I am referring to. This has happened a lot at work over the years, and it is here that I wish I could deploy footnotes. 
"You see this thing that I said, it does make sense - you just need to have grown up in exactly my background with the same interests. That is all."
-or-
"There is something to back this line of reasoning up you know."
Also, little comments can have so much of a story behind them or little bits of commentary, at least, that fleshes them out. I am a fan of extraneous information - footnotes allow you to add options to that extraneous information. They are like director's commentary tracks (which, ironically, I never listen to) on DVDs. My links, distributed unevenly through a post, also perform a similar function.

I have recently been thinking about why I do this and I have decided to term it "second-order" - this is where you need to have some knowledge (that is, apparently, not general) in order to get it. I know all conversations are essentially this and communication always needs shared knowledge to start from - whether that is a shared name for a colour or a shared understanding of what the rules of immigration actually are - but it is more about the less general nature of this shared knowledge. Basically, an unshared knowledge that I wished was shared.

I think my favourite joke/stand up [you can see it here] routine by Stewart Lee, who has a book made up of his scripts extensively footnoted, is basically second-order in its execution and the thing I like about things like this is that people obviously have different speeds of connecting two things together. That, I enjoy.

Apart from being an explanation, I also wanted to write this without the use of footnotes. I just about managed it although there were many temptations to stray and I have used a single link.

Tuesday 2 June 2015

Northern Ireland day trip

Initially, when planning the Irish trip, I thought that I would go to Ireland via Wales and return home via Northern Ireland and Scotland which would form an interesting "state of the union" week. I didn't do this though - the connections from Northern Ireland to Scotland are not quite as smooth as they used to be in terms of the ferry and so I thought against it - but that did not alter my desire to go to one of the more interesting parts of the UK [1] - and the only one with a land border. And it seemed only sensible to cross that land border by train as there was a (relatively) famous train between the two capitals. I did not just want to go to Belfast though – ideally I wanted to also go to the Giant’s Causeway as the northern coast was also recommended to me. 

An early start is not always a pleasant one. The coach tour day-trip from Dublin to Belfast AND the Giant’s Causeway and then back again was barely more expensive than the return ticket on the train and it seemed a nice, packed timetable (as you can see here):

I won’t lie, the bit that appealed most was the “political tour” but it was merely an option. For I could also go and visit a museum dedicated to a ship that didn’t even finish one cruise as it was so shoddily made in Belfast. Pride of the city.
The drawback with tours, as with so much of life itself, is other people. Other people can be so annoying – getting in the way, being loud, enjoying themselves. I don’t go on holiday to see other people having fun.
The benefit of tours, as with so much of life itself, is other people. Knowledge can be infectious, and good tour guides can really make things come along nicely.

One of the things that I often like about train travel is the window seat and watching scenery going by – this is kind of the same on coaches but not quite as good. It was still interesting to see the Irish scenery and roads but, fortunately, we had a tour guide too – and he regaled us with tales of his youth and made a stab at presenting the thorny history of Ireland and Great Britain. He tried hard to explain that it was not a religious divide at all but it just happened to be along religious lines[2]. And with religious reasoning. The questions that came from the tour group, which was fairly cosmopolitan but with more than a smattering of Americans (I would say that they were greatest in volume) generally tried to use the correct terminology and usually succeeded but it all seems so illogical seen through 21st century eyes that it became much easier to use P's & C's[3]. It was said with sufficient humour and explanation but a little line of
“Sorry for any English here, but you really will be the bad guys in this story!” 
was jokily true. He did also mention that when it came to their post-crash time of need, the UK did show themselves to be friends indeed – and that they don’t forget that either.
In terms of difficulty, crossing the border was as uneventful as taking the 50 bus from Maastricht to Aachen, with no checks or border control. I was a little confused by this actually as neither is part of the Schengen zone and it meant that I had not shown my passport at all on the trip.
Driving into Belfast felt like a steady urbanisation of the roadside rather than a strict delineation, and we went to the Titanic Quarter where the new museum was based. Here, we were split into those that wanted to go to the Titanic museum and those that wanted to have the political taxi tour – and it seemed a pretty obvious split visually from how the tourists split. The taxis were black cabs and so were nice and spacious enough for a group of 5 – I was with two pairs of tourists from the United States.  

I didn't really know much about Belfast and, as a child, the troubles affected me in London mainly through the actions of the “gentleman bombers[4]”  of the IRA. I knew that Belfast was “troubled” at the time, I knew that even recently there had been car bombs in Northern Ireland (surprisingly, this was not mainstream news – terrorist bombs, detonated or not, would normally be newsworthy, I had thought) but I was not really aware of the makeup of the city or the day-to-day effects of the dispute. The Good Friday agreement was almost two decades ago so I was not expecting a scarred city, as such, but a heritage of the troubles and a historical view of it.
First we were driven to some of the wall murals, which reminded me a little of Berlin, painted near the divide – in fact I was kind of surprised to learn that the city was still divided. We were on the Republican side (not Catholic, Republican) on the Falls Road which had quite a history of its own.

Just beyond the murals we were driven to, there was a large open gate on the road and the pavement. Beyond that gate was another gate – a double gate to keep it safe with a little DMZ between them – and then Shankhill Road on the Loyalist (not Protestant, Loyalist) side. This, I thought, was pretty interesting - a nice little relic of the recent past. What was sort of revelatory to me was to find out how recent a past it was – last night and they were also due to be closed later that day as they are every day. This was not a relic of the past – it was present day. I genuinely did not know this happened, the gates are closed and this portion of the city is divided along the Orwellian sounding “Peace Line”. It isn't completely divided as you can go around the gates but it is still seen as necessary to keep the gates shut in the evenings. Our taxi driver was pretty engaging on the topic and he explained that people on either side of the line did mix in other parts of the city and at work but not here. The same people that are divided here would be mixed elsewhere – although that sounded a little too positive for my liking with the fact of it being that the gates were still needed – and from about 5 in the afternoon. The murals were also not pure, preserved in aspic, tourism – they were fresh (including some anti-Tory ones too) and they would continue to be provocative as the equivalents would be on the other side. There were many referencing Bobby Sands, for instance. This did not seem a healthy situation at all and I had heard a few years ago that Belfast had the most discriminatory population of Europe though I cannot remember where that was, but I think the euphemism is that it is socially conservative.


My fellow tourists mainly talked amongst themselves but I did join in sometimes. I was asked how I felt as a Brit hearing all this stuff (inclusive of all the Irish commentary too) as it was all a little anti-English. I responded that what happened in the past was not, as far as I was concerned, a question of nationality per se, it was the oppressed versus the oppressors, and that the poor and dispossessed in England would have far more in common with the Irish[5]. I also mentioned my memories of bombs in London and bomb scares on a regular basis – it was part of my childhood. The other point which got me a little annoyed was when one of the ladies in the cab was, proudly, telling us all how she used to go to St Patrick’s Day parades in Boston and donate money.
“Oh, we always donated a lot.”
“That money founds its way via bombs to London.”
An awkward silence followed, but, frankly, not awkward or long enough for my liking and it didn’t really cause a response. I don’t think she wanted to be funding terrorism,, and she had been – but the lack of any comment at all suggested that she didn’t really realise it. I did smile as I said it, maybe it wasn't understood.
We drove through the Unionist side too and there was some provocative murals here too – aggrandising some killers. Our driver then took us to the parts of the city without gates but still separated along the “peace line” by peace wall. Walls for Peace.

These peaceful walls were rather tall and quite imposing bringing their own atmosphere into otherwise normal looking parts of a city. The walls we saw had three parts to them which were an indication of the heightening of tensions and efforts over the years. The original wall was not tall enough at (2m or so) and so it was added to to stop projectile attacks. And the next part was also added for the same reason – not particularly peaceful sounding. At a total height of approx 7.6m, some do still try and chuck things over and you can see quite a bit of detritus at the bottom of the walls.

Some house even had bomb blast protection over their gardens, a little further along from her (I felt uncomfortable taking photos but I think you can see on google streetview here).
After meeting up back at the Titanic quarter, we made our way to the Giant’s Causeway and the Carrick A Rede Rope Bridge. On the way, we stopped at a castle that is used in Game of Thrones called "Dun Luce Castle". Game of Thrones seems a significant element of the apparent tourism push in Northern Ireland. I am not sure how I feel about this but a similar thing has been successful for Lord of The Rings and New Zealand from what I hear. All were stunning places but there is not much I can really add about them – except photos.
click here for album


1. The terminology around Britain and Ireland is a little confusing and fraught with the risk of massive offence. Was there a deliberate error in even that statement?
2. I find it interesting that we are at pains to say that this is not religious – this is not Christian fundamentalism backed up with explosives. It maybe a little simplistic to do this, but it is the same the world over and when it is not Christianity – it will quickly be labelled religious then.
3. It also reminds me of some of my old training sessions when learning about investment banking and the way trades worked. The trainers would explain, in detail, about the complexities and the correct words to use and what they meant. As the Q&A rolled around, they would try to avoid all comment about analogies to gambling until enough questions came and it was just the easiest way to answer it – we bet on this and if it pays off, we win big. And, the house always wins. Unless they have really messed up their credit risk calculations in which case they lose. But are reimbursed by the government and everyone else pays for it in a beautiful insurance scheme without premiums for the participants – which is, eerily, kind of similar to the CDS pyramid that collapsed...
4. A wonderful turn of phrase from Stewart Lee on the 2005 London Al-Qaeda bombings:
“Who are they, these inhuman bombers that strike at the very heart of our society with no respect for human life, without even the courtesy of a perfunctory warning? It makes you nostalgic, doesn't it, for the good old days of the IRA. ’Cause they gave warnings, didn't they? They were gentleman bombers, the finest terrorists this country’s ever had. We’ll not see their like again. Let’s have a little clap for the IRA . . . ’Cause the IRA, they were decent British terrorists. They didn't want to be British. But they were. And, as such, they couldn't help but embody some fundamentally decent British values”.

5. The rich and powerful exploiting difference to divide and cause pain for the poor is hardly something we have moved away from. And, as then, we still kind of enjoy being whipped up to hate people we don’t know about but some rich people have told us to hate.

Monday 1 June 2015

A short time in Dublin

Dublin is a relatively small city and is sized such that it has a small tram system and buses as transport options but I felt I could walk around more simply, most of the time. I bought a 2 day city bus sightseeing tour which meant I could use it to go around - something that I had never done before.

Being heavily influenced by the independence from "England" and there are many parts of the city that are directly referencing it from the statues of the leaders to the names of the streets and buildings.
One of the sightseeing stops was to Kilmainham Gaol which is where a number of revolutionaries were kept captive by the British and also killed. It was here that the leaders of the Easter Rising of 1916 were executed and so I thought it was worth a visit and tour. The tour was very interesting (although slightly curtailed as one wing was being redeveloped) and well run. The Easter Rising captives were the main subjects but the jail itself was interesting as a building and as point in history. It was built as modern jail and prison records show the effects of the potato famine too with the numbers of children incarcerated for the theft of food - it is thought likely that many were happy to be caught so that they would get some food.


The size of Dublin makes it pleasantly walkable but I did fancy a change of scenery for that walk which took me, via recommendation to Howth. Howth is a suburb of Dublin but it feels so far away that it does not seem connected at all. In fact, as I walked around, you could look back on Dublin (or my image of Dublin). The reason for going to Howth is that it is an old fishing village with great scenery and looking out to sea, it was astonishing. The weather in Ireland is changeable - what many call "British weather" - and this meant that within the few hours I was there, I saw a lot of astonishing cloud movement. I was also able to look down on Dublin's port area and it was quite amazing to see a storm passing over.

There were lots of relatively interesting things about Dublin but not a huge amount stood out. I enjoyed it but I did find that the pubs that I saw were like Irish theme pubs - this may have been due to being in Dublin but I am not sure I'd enjoy that for very long

Ireland 2015 - click for photo album